COMPARE
Arthaya Equity Long Short Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option vs qsif Equity Long Short Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan
Arthaya Equity Long Short Fund and qsif Equity Long Short Fund are both in the Equity Long-Short Fund category, from Union Asset Management Company Private Limited and Quantum Asset Management Company Private Limited respectively. qsif Equity Long Short Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
qsif Equity Long Short Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.89 percentage points.
| Arthaya Equity Long Short Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | qsif Equity Long Short Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Equity Long-Short Fund | Equity Long-Short Fund |
| AMC | Union Asset Management Company Private Limited | Quantum Asset Management Company Private Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹9.7256 (2026-10-28) | ₹10.8641 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | - | - |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 3.95% | 3.06% |
| Inception | 2026-05-03 | 2025-10-08 |
Returns
This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
Arthaya Equity Long Short Fund and qsif Equity Long Short Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Arthaya Equity Long Short Fund or qsif Equity Long Short Fund?
qsif Equity Long Short Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.89 percentage points lower than Arthaya Equity Long Short Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Arthaya Equity Long Short Fund and qsif Equity Long Short Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which fund has a longer track record, Arthaya Equity Long Short Fund or qsif Equity Long Short Fund?
qsif Equity Long Short Fund launched on 2025-10-08, making it older than Arthaya Equity Long Short Fund (launched 2026-05-03). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.