PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Alphagrep Multi Asset Allocation Fund-direct-growth vs ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth

Alphagrep Multi Asset Allocation Fund-direct-growth and ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund are both in the Multi Asset Allocation category, from AlphaGrep Investment Management Private Limited and ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited respectively. ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.62 percentage points.

Alphagrep Multi Asset Allocation Fund-direct-growthICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
CategoryMulti Asset AllocationMulti Asset Allocation
AMCAlphaGrep Investment Management Private LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited
BenchmarkCRISIL Hybrid 50+50 - Moderate IndexNifty 200 TRI (65%) + Nifty Composite Debt Index (25%) + Domestic Price of Gold (6%) + Domestic Price of Silver (1%) + iCOMDEX Composite Index (3%)
NAV₹10.1232 (2026-10-28)₹850.6006 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹122.09 Cr₹82,492.45 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.47%0.85%
Inception2026-07-062002-10-07

Returns

This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.

Risk Metrics

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.

Portfolio Analytics

ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.

Punji Fund Health Score

Alphagrep Multi Asset Allocation Fund-direct-growth has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, Alphagrep Multi Asset Allocation Fund-direct-growth or ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund?

ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.62 percentage points lower than Alphagrep Multi Asset Allocation Fund-direct-growth's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't Alphagrep Multi Asset Allocation Fund-direct-growth and ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which has higher AUM, Alphagrep Multi Asset Allocation Fund-direct-growth or ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund?

ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund has ₹82,492 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹122 Cr for Alphagrep Multi Asset Allocation Fund-direct-growth. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Alphagrep Multi Asset Allocation Fund-direct-growth or ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund?

ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund's portfolio YTM (7.7902%) is higher than Alphagrep Multi Asset Allocation Fund-direct-growth's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.

Which fund has a longer track record, Alphagrep Multi Asset Allocation Fund-direct-growth or ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund?

ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Allocation Fund launched on 2002-10-07, making it older than Alphagrep Multi Asset Allocation Fund-direct-growth (launched 2026-07-06). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.