PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth vs UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth and UTI Infrastructure Fund- are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited and UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. respectively. Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.82 percentage points.

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-GrowthUTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct
CategorySectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ Thematic
AMCAditya Birla Sun Life AMC LimitedUTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd.
BenchmarkBSE 500 TRINifty Infrastructure TRI
NAV₹29.61 (2026-10-28)₹142.8992 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹1,356.868 Cr₹1,974.005 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.19%2.01%
Inception2020-10-052003-01-02

Returns

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (19.9% vs UTI Infrastructure Fund-'s 14.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

UTI Infrastructure Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth or UTI Infrastructure Fund-?

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth's 3-year rolling CAGR of 19.9% is higher than UTI Infrastructure Fund-'s 14.6%. Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth sits in the 75th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 25th percentile for UTI Infrastructure Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth or UTI Infrastructure Fund-?

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.82 percentage points lower than UTI Infrastructure Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth or UTI Infrastructure Fund-?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), UTI Infrastructure Fund- has been more volatile than Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.64 for Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth vs 0.17 for UTI Infrastructure Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth or UTI Infrastructure Fund-?

UTI Infrastructure Fund- has ₹1,974 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,357 Cr for Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth or UTI Infrastructure Fund-?

UTI Infrastructure Fund- launched on 2003-01-02, making it older than Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth (launched 2020-10-05). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.