COMPARE
Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth vs Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth and Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund are both in the Multi Asset Allocation category, from Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited and Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited respectively. Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.20 percentage points.
| Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth | Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Asset Allocation | Multi Asset Allocation |
| AMC | Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Benchmark | 65% BSE 200 + 25% CRISIL Short Term Bond Index + 5% of Domestic prices of Gold + 5% of Domestic prices of Silver | CRISIL SHORT TERM BOND INDEX |
| NAV | ₹16.9616 (2026-10-28) | ₹25.7138 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹7,364.741 Cr | ₹18,005.338 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.67% | 0.47% |
| Inception | 2023-01-11 | 2020-08-07 |
Returns
Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (18.5% vs Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth's 17.8%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
Portfolio Analytics
Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth | Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 26.6403 | 20.3984 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.0028 | 7.3728 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.0218% | 1.1613% |
| Active Share | - | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | 56.99999999999999% | 74% |
| YTM | 7.6721% | 7.18% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | 1.7 yrs | 2.33 yrs |
Punji Fund Health Score
Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth or Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?
Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 18.5% is higher than Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth's 17.8%. Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund sits in the 100th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 87th percentile for Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth or Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?
Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.20 percentage points lower than Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth or Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth has been more volatile than Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.70 for Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth vs 1.02 for Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth or Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?
Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund has ₹18,005 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹7,365 Cr for Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth or Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?
Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth's portfolio YTM (7.6721%) is higher than Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which has longer duration (more interest-rate sensitivity), Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth or Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?
Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund has the longer Macaulay duration of the two, meaning its NAV is more sensitive to interest-rate changes - a longer-duration debt fund tends to gain more when rates fall and lose more when rates rise, compared to a shorter-duration fund. Duration is expressed in years but isn't literally about how long you hold the fund; it's a measure of price sensitivity to rate moves. If you expect rates to fall, the longer-duration fund benefits more; if you expect rates to rise or want to minimize that swing, the shorter-duration fund is the more conservative pick.
Which fund has a longer track record, Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth or Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?
Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund launched on 2020-08-07, making it older than Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct Growth (launched 2023-01-11). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.