PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth

Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund and LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited and LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited respectively. Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.18 percentage points.

Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund - Direct Plan - GrowthLIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth
CategorySectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ Thematic
AMCAditya Birla Sun Life AMC LimitedLIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited
BenchmarkNifty Financial Services TRINifty Infrastructure TRI
NAV₹65.34 (2026-10-28)₹59.1519 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹3,359.439 Cr₹1,102.82 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.15%1.33%
Inception2013-11-252008-01-31

Returns

Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (16.2% vs LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s 15.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?

Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 16.2% is higher than LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s 15.6%. Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund sits in the 37th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 34th percentile for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?

Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.18 percentage points lower than LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has been more volatile than Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.02 for Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund vs 0.58 for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?

Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund has ₹3,359 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,103 Cr for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?

LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- launched on 2008-01-31, making it older than Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services Fund (launched 2013-11-25). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.