COMPARE
360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth vs UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund-Growth Option- Direct
360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth and UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund- are both in the Thematic Fund category, from 360 ONE Asset Management Limited and UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. respectively. 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.18 percentage points.
| 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth | UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund-Growth Option- Direct | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Thematic Fund | Thematic Fund |
| AMC | 360 ONE Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Benchmark | BSE 200 TRI | Nifty Transportation & Logistics TRI |
| NAV | ₹18.6456 (2026-10-28) | ₹322.3302 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹749.58 Cr | ₹4,382.821 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.16% | 0.98% |
| Inception | 2021-11-08 | 2008-04-11 |
Returns
360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (24.1% vs UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund-'s 19.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth | UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund-Growth Option- Direct | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.26 | 0.41 |
| 3Y Alpha | 2.7846% | 0.3077% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 16.5336% | 17.9913% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.51 | 0.58 |
Portfolio Analytics
UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth | UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund-Growth Option- Direct | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 21.4222 | 32.3932 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 9.9087 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.4786% | 0.9258% |
| Active Share | 82.9% | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | 106% | - |
| YTM | - | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth or UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund-?
360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth's 3-year rolling CAGR of 24.1% is higher than UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund-'s 19.6%. 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth sits in the 90th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 74th percentile for UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth or UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund-?
UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.18 percentage points lower than 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth or UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund-?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund- has been more volatile than 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.26 for 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth vs 0.41 for UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth or UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund-?
UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund- has ₹4,383 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹750 Cr for 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth or UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund-?
UTI-Transportation and Logistics Fund- launched on 2008-04-11, making it older than 360 One Quant Fund Direct Growth (launched 2021-11-08). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.