PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

360 One Flexicap Fund-direct Plan- Growth vs Abakkus Flexi Cap Fund - Direct - Growth

360 One Flexicap Fund- and Abakkus Flexi Cap Fund are both in the Flexi Cap Fund category, from 360 ONE Asset Management Limited and Abakkus Investment Managers Private Limited respectively. Abakkus Flexi Cap Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Abakkus Flexi Cap Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.09 percentage points.

360 One Flexicap Fund-direct Plan- GrowthAbakkus Flexi Cap Fund - Direct - Growth
CategoryFlexi Cap FundFlexi Cap Fund
AMC360 ONE Asset Management LimitedAbakkus Investment Managers Private Limited
BenchmarkBSE 500 TRIBSE 500 TRI
NAV₹16.3372 (2026-10-28)₹10.438 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹2,189.12 Cr₹7,972.96 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.92%0.83%
Inception2023-06-122025-12-08

Returns

This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.

Risk Metrics

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.

Portfolio Analytics

360 One Flexicap Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Abakkus Flexi Cap Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, 360 One Flexicap Fund- or Abakkus Flexi Cap Fund?

Abakkus Flexi Cap Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.09 percentage points lower than 360 One Flexicap Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't 360 One Flexicap Fund- and Abakkus Flexi Cap Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which has higher AUM, 360 One Flexicap Fund- or Abakkus Flexi Cap Fund?

Abakkus Flexi Cap Fund has ₹7,973 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹2,189 Cr for 360 One Flexicap Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, 360 One Flexicap Fund- or Abakkus Flexi Cap Fund?

360 One Flexicap Fund- launched on 2023-06-12, making it older than Abakkus Flexi Cap Fund (launched 2025-12-08). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.