PunjiPUNJI
FoF OverseasEdelweiss Asset Management Limited

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option

Benchmark: MSCI GOLDEN DRAGON (INR) · Riskometer: Very High

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund is a FoF Overseas mutual fund managed by Edelweiss Asset Management Limited, benchmarked against MSCI GOLDEN DRAGON (INR). Riskometer: Very High.

View full analysis on Punji.ai →

₹66.655

NAV (2026-10-28)

₹2,701.504 Cr

AUM

0.75%

EXPENSE RATIO (DIRECT)

2009-07-09

INCEPTION

NAV History

LEARN: Growth of ₹100 · NAV · CAGR

CHART

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund - growth of ₹100

Growth of ₹100 invested on 2021-10-31, not raw NAV - the standard way to compare fund performance regardless of NAV level. Daily resolution for the last 90 days, weekly up to 2 years, monthly beyond that.

-1428691111532021-10-312023-12-312025-02-162025-08-172026-02-152026-08-022026-08-302026-10-042026-10-28
NAV History - Last 30 Days(exact daily NAV)
DateNAV (₹)1D Change
2026-10-2866.655+1.4 (+2.1%)
2026-10-2765.255-0.065 (-0.1%)
2026-10-2665.32+0 (+0%)
2026-10-2565.32+0 (+0%)
2026-10-2365.32+0.165 (+0.3%)
2026-10-2265.155-2.007 (-3%)
2026-10-2167.162-0.961 (-1.4%)
2026-10-2068.123+0 (+0%)
2026-10-1968.123-0.767 (-1.1%)
2026-10-1868.89+0 (+0%)
2026-10-1668.89+0.784 (+1.2%)
2026-10-1568.106-2.743 (-3.9%)
2026-10-1470.849-0.131 (-0.2%)
2026-10-1370.98-2.047 (-2.8%)
2026-10-1273.027+0.149 (+0.2%)
2026-10-1172.878+0 (+0%)
2026-10-0872.878-0.832 (-1.1%)
2026-10-0773.71-0.38 (-0.5%)
2026-10-0674.09+0.462 (+0.6%)
2026-10-0573.628+1.979 (+2.8%)
2026-10-0471.649+0 (+0%)
2026-10-0171.649+0 (+0%)
2026-09-3071.649-
BQuality · 76.4/100
CSafety · 55.7/100
BCompound · 66.7/100

Punji Fund Health Score - percentile-within-category. See methodology.

CATEGORY COMPARISON

0.59

3Y Sharpe Ratio

#35 of 49 - median 0.94

10.7%

3Y Alpha

#2 of 49 - median 1.9%

22.7%

3Y Std Deviation

#41 of 49 - median 16.9%

0.75%

Total Expense Ratio

#29 of 51 - median 0.57%

₹2,702 Cr

AUM

#5 of 51 - median ₹354 Cr

100%

3Y Beat Benchmark %

vs MSCI GOLDEN DRAGON (INR)

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund returns

Lumpsum returns: full range of outcomes across every overlapping window in the fund's history for each holding period, not one trailing number.

Holding periodMin rolling CAGRMedian rolling CAGRMax rolling CAGR
1Y-44%+14%+90.2%
3Y-19.5%+12.8%+33.4%

Actual point-to-point CAGR for the single best and single worst overlapping window of each holding period in the fund's history - historical fact, not a forecast. Independent of the lumpsum/SIP toggle above - always CAGR-based.

Holding periodBest windowWorst windowBeat benchmark
1Y+90.2% (2020-03-18 → 2021-03-18)-44.0% (2021-10-25 → 2022-10-25)100%
3Y+33.4% (2018-02-11 → 2021-02-10)-19.5% (2021-02-05 → 2024-02-05)100%

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund category rank vs peers

MetricValueRankCategory median
3Y Rolling CAGR12.8%#24 of 46 13.1%
3Y Sharpe Ratio0.59#35 of 49 0.94
3Y Alpha10.7%#2 of 49 1.9%
3Y Std Deviation22.7%#41 of 49 (lower is better)16.9%
Total Expense Ratio0.75%#29 of 51 (lower is better)0.57%
AUM₹2,702 Cr#5 of 51 ₹354 Cr
3Y Max Drawdown20.86%#27 of 49 (lower is better)20.04%

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund risk metrics

3-year window vs. MSCI GOLDEN DRAGON (INR).

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund holdings

Portfolio as of 2026-08-31

Hold multiple funds? See our Portfolio Overlap Tool to see if they actually hold different stocks.

CHART

Top sector holdings

Share of portfolio (% to NAV) in each of the top sectors.

100%TOP 1100%
Other 100%

TOP HOLDINGS

JPM GREATER CHINA-I-I2 USD ()52.8%
Taiwan Semiconductor (Information Technology)4.45302%
Tencent (Communication Services)3.50844%
Alibaba (Consumer Discretionary)2.56386%
Clearing Corporation of India Ltd. ()2.45%
Delta Electronics (Information Technology)1.66426%
Elite Material (Information Technology)1.3494%
ASPEED Technology (Information Technology)1.3494%
All Ring Tech (Information Technology)1.16948%
HKEX (Financials)1.07952%

Funds similar to Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund

Top funds in the same category, ranked by performance - not holdings overlap. Pick up to 2 to compare alongside this fund:

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund Punji analytics

ADVANCED RISK-ADJUSTED METRICS

3-year window vs. MSCI GOLDEN DRAGON (INR). Not commonly published by other Indian fund platforms.

CHART

Asset Allocation

As of Sep-2026

2.22%TOP 32%
Equity 0%Debt 0%Cash 2.22%

Portfolio analytics as of Sep-2026.

Frequently asked questions

How often has Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund beaten its benchmark over 3-year periods?

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund beat its benchmark, MSCI GOLDEN DRAGON (INR), in 100% of all overlapping 3-year rolling windows in its history. This is different from simply having a positive return - it measures how often the fund's own 3-year CAGR exceeded the benchmark's 3-year CAGR over the exact same dates, which is a more direct read on the manager's stock selection than a single trailing alpha figure computed over one window.

What is Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund's 3-year rolling return, and how does it rank?

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR (median across all rolling 3-year windows in the data) is 12.8%. That places it in the 50th percentile within its category, FoF Overseas - meaning it has outperformed roughly 50% of peers in the same category over this window. The category median for this metric is 13.1%, so comparing Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund's figure against that median shows how much it has beaten (or trailed) a typical fund in this category. Rolling returns average performance across many overlapping windows rather than a single start/end date, which makes them a steadier read on consistency than a simple point-to-point return.

How risky is Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund?

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund carries a "Very High" risk rating on SEBI's mandated riskometer scale, the same standardized classification every Indian mutual fund must disclose. This rating reflects the fund's underlying portfolio composition and historical volatility, and is set independently of any single AMC's own marketing - it's meant to give investors a comparable, at-a-glance sense of how much the fund's value can swing before deciding whether it matches their own risk appetite and investment horizon. A higher-risk rating isn't inherently bad; it typically correlates with higher long-term return potential, but also with larger short-term drawdowns, so it should be read alongside the fund's category and your own time horizon rather than in isolation.

What is Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund's expense ratio?

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.75% per year - the annual fee the AMC deducts from the fund's assets to cover management and operating costs, already reflected in the NAV you see (it isn't billed separately). Direct plans skip the distributor commission built into Regular plans, which is why a direct-plan expense ratio is almost always lower than the same scheme's Regular-plan version. Over long holding periods, even a difference of a few basis points compounds into a meaningfully different final corpus, which is why expense ratio is one of the few fund attributes an investor can compare with total certainty before investing, unlike future returns.

How does Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund's expense ratio compare to its category?

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund's expense ratio of 0.75% ranks #29 of 51 funds in the FoF Overseas category (lower is better) - the category median is 0.57%. Expense ratio is deducted from the fund's assets every year regardless of performance, so a lower ratio is a real, certain cost advantage rather than a projection, unlike future returns.

How big is Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund, and how does that compare to its category?

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund manages ₹2,702 Cr in assets, ranking #5 of 51 funds by size in the FoF Overseas category - the category median is ₹354 Cr. A larger fund generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but in categories with a smaller investable universe (like small or mid cap), a very large fund can also face more difficulty entering and exiting positions without moving the price.

What's the worst drawdown Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund has experienced, and how does that compare to its category?

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund's worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 3 years was 20.86%, ranking #27 of 49 funds in the FoF Overseas category (lower is better) - the category median is 20.04%. Max drawdown measures the deepest loss an investor holding through the worst stretch would have seen, before any recovery - a smaller number means a gentler ride, though it says nothing about how long the fund took to recover.

How has Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund performed against its benchmark, MSCI GOLDEN DRAGON (INR)?

Over a 3-year window, Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund has outperformed its benchmark, MSCI GOLDEN DRAGON (INR), by 10.7% (alpha). Alpha measures the fund's return in excess of what its benchmark alone would have delivered, after adjusting for the risk taken (beta of 0.68 here) - a positive alpha means the fund manager's stock selection and allocation calls added real value beyond simply tracking the market, while a negative alpha means the fund would have been better replicated by a low-cost index fund tracking the same benchmark. This is a trailing, historical figure and isn't a guarantee of future outperformance.

What's the best and worst 3-year holding period for Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund historically?

Looking at every overlapping 3-year window in Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund's history, the best-performing window ran from 2018-02-11 to 2021-02-10, delivering a 33.4% CAGR. The worst-performing window ran from 2021-02-05 to 2024-02-05, delivering a -19.5% CAGR. This is a historical record of actual past outcomes, not a prediction - it shows the real range of results an investor holding for exactly 3 years could have seen depending on entry timing, which is why rolling returns (median across all windows, shown above) are a more representative single number than either extreme.

How concentrated are Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund's top holdings?

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund's single largest disclosed holding, JPM GREATER CHINA-I-I2 USD, accounts for 52.8% of NAV. Its top 5 holdings together make up 65.8% of the portfolio, and its top 10 disclosed holdings make up 72.4% - as of 2026-08-31. A higher concentration in the top few names means the fund's returns lean more heavily on those specific bets paying off, while a flatter spread means no single holding drives outcomes as much either way.

Who manages Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund, and what category does it belong to?

Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund is managed by Edelweiss Asset Management Limited and is classified under the FoF Overseas category, the SEBI-defined scheme categorization that groups funds by their investment mandate (market-cap focus, sector, or asset mix) so investors can compare like-for-like funds rather than across unrelated strategies. The AMC (asset management company) is the regulated entity legally responsible for the fund's operations, portfolio decisions, and disclosures, though day-to-day investment calls are made by a designated fund manager within the mandate set by the scheme's category and stated objective.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.