UTI Retirement Fund- Direct Plan
Benchmark: CRISIL Short Term Debt Hybrid 60+40 Index · Riskometer: Moderately High
UTI Retirement Fund- is a Retirement mutual fund managed by UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd., benchmarked against CRISIL Short Term Debt Hybrid 60+40 Index. Riskometer: Moderately High.
View full analysis on Punji.ai →
LEARN: Growth of ₹100 · NAV · CAGR
CHART
UTI Retirement Fund- - growth of ₹100
Growth of ₹100 invested on 2025-10-31, not raw NAV - the standard way to compare fund performance regardless of NAV level. Daily resolution for the last 90 days, weekly up to 2 years, monthly beyond that.
NAV History - Last 30 Days(exact daily NAV)
| Date | NAV (₹) | 1D Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-28 | 53.3057 | -0.0297 (-0.1%) |
| 2026-10-27 | 53.3354 | +0.0174 (+0%) |
| 2026-10-26 | 53.318 | +0.1209 (+0.2%) |
| 2026-10-25 | 53.1971 | +0 (+0%) |
| 2026-10-23 | 53.1971 | -0.2308 (-0.4%) |
| 2026-10-22 | 53.4279 | -0.1736 (-0.3%) |
| 2026-10-21 | 53.6015 | -0.101 (-0.2%) |
| 2026-10-20 | 53.7025 | +0 (+0%) |
| 2026-10-19 | 53.7025 | -0.1824 (-0.3%) |
| 2026-10-18 | 53.8849 | +0 (+0%) |
| 2026-10-16 | 53.8849 | +0.1645 (+0.3%) |
| 2026-10-15 | 53.7204 | +0.229 (+0.4%) |
| 2026-10-14 | 53.4914 | -0.0554 (-0.1%) |
| 2026-10-13 | 53.5468 | +0.2963 (+0.6%) |
| 2026-10-12 | 53.2505 | -0.1869 (-0.3%) |
| 2026-10-11 | 53.4374 | +0 (+0%) |
| 2026-10-09 | 53.4374 | +0.2332 (+0.4%) |
| 2026-10-08 | 53.2042 | -0.4461 (-0.8%) |
| 2026-10-07 | 53.6503 | -0.2041 (-0.4%) |
| 2026-10-06 | 53.8544 | +0.1329 (+0.2%) |
| 2026-10-05 | 53.7215 | +0.1388 (+0.3%) |
| 2026-10-04 | 53.5827 | +0 (+0%) |
| 2026-10-01 | 53.5827 | -0.1964 (-0.4%) |
| 2026-09-30 | 53.7791 | - |
Punji Fund Health Score - percentile-within-category. See methodology.
CATEGORY COMPARISON
UTI Retirement Fund- returns
Lumpsum returns: full range of outcomes across every overlapping window in the fund's history for each holding period, not one trailing number.
| Holding period | Min rolling CAGR | Median rolling CAGR | Max rolling CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | -2.1% | +1.1% | +4.6% |
| 3Y | +7.9% | +8.7% | +10% |
Actual point-to-point CAGR for the single best and single worst overlapping window of each holding period in the fund's history - historical fact, not a forecast. Independent of the lumpsum/SIP toggle above - always CAGR-based.
| Holding period | Best window | Worst window | Beat benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | +4.6% (2025-08-08 → 2026-08-08) | -2.1% (2025-10-23 → 2026-10-23) | 0% |
| 3Y | +10.0% (2023-08-16 → 2026-08-15) | +7.9% (2023-10-13 → 2026-10-12) | 74.19% |
UTI Retirement Fund- category rank vs peers
| Metric | Value | Rank | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3Y Rolling CAGR | 8.7% | #23 of 27 | 12.7% |
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.16 | #11 of 27 | 0.05 |
| 3Y Alpha | 0.8% | #11 of 27 | 0.1% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 5.9% | #12 of 27 (lower is better) | 9.6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16% | #13 of 29 (lower is better) | 1.15% |
| AUM | ₹4,540 Cr | #2 of 29 | ₹265 Cr |
| 3Y Max Drawdown | 6.27% | #10 of 27 (lower is better) | 11.10% |
UTI Retirement Fund- risk metrics
0.1563
0.2233
0.7569
0.8311
5.9033
-6.2671
91.5112
83.9088
2.3241
1.2737
3-year window vs. CRISIL Short Term Debt Hybrid 60+40 Index.
UTI Retirement Fund- holdings
Portfolio as of 2026-09-30
Hold multiple funds? See our Portfolio Overlap Tool to see if they actually hold different stocks.
CHART
Top sector holdings
Share of portfolio (% to NAV) in each of the top sectors.
TOP HOLDINGS
Funds similar to UTI Retirement Fund-
Top funds in the same category, ranked by performance - not holdings overlap. Pick up to 2 to compare alongside this fund:
UTI Retirement Fund- Punji analytics
ADVANCED RISK-ADJUSTED METRICS
3-year window vs. CRISIL Short Term Debt Hybrid 60+40 Index. Not commonly published by other Indian fund platforms.
16.7999
1.9819
CHART
Asset Allocation
As of Sep-2026
CHART
Market Cap Split
As of Sep-2026
CHART
Credit Quality
As of Sep-2026
Portfolio analytics as of Sep-2026.
Frequently asked questions
How often has UTI Retirement Fund- beaten its benchmark over 3-year periods?
UTI Retirement Fund- beat its benchmark, CRISIL Short Term Debt Hybrid 60+40 Index, in 74.19% of all overlapping 3-year rolling windows in its history. This is different from simply having a positive return - it measures how often the fund's own 3-year CAGR exceeded the benchmark's 3-year CAGR over the exact same dates, which is a more direct read on the manager's stock selection than a single trailing alpha figure computed over one window.
What is UTI Retirement Fund-'s 3-year rolling return, and how does it rank?
UTI Retirement Fund-'s 3-year rolling CAGR (median across all rolling 3-year windows in the data) is 8.7%. That places it in the 19th percentile within its category, Retirement Fund - meaning it has outperformed roughly 19% of peers in the same category over this window. The category median for this metric is 12.7%, so comparing UTI Retirement Fund-'s figure against that median shows how much it has beaten (or trailed) a typical fund in this category. Rolling returns average performance across many overlapping windows rather than a single start/end date, which makes them a steadier read on consistency than a simple point-to-point return.
How risky is UTI Retirement Fund-?
UTI Retirement Fund- carries a "Moderately High" risk rating on SEBI's mandated riskometer scale, the same standardized classification every Indian mutual fund must disclose. This rating reflects the fund's underlying portfolio composition and historical volatility, and is set independently of any single AMC's own marketing - it's meant to give investors a comparable, at-a-glance sense of how much the fund's value can swing before deciding whether it matches their own risk appetite and investment horizon. A higher-risk rating isn't inherently bad; it typically correlates with higher long-term return potential, but also with larger short-term drawdowns, so it should be read alongside the fund's category and your own time horizon rather than in isolation.
What is UTI Retirement Fund-'s expense ratio?
UTI Retirement Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 1.16% per year - the annual fee the AMC deducts from the fund's assets to cover management and operating costs, already reflected in the NAV you see (it isn't billed separately). Direct plans skip the distributor commission built into Regular plans, which is why a direct-plan expense ratio is almost always lower than the same scheme's Regular-plan version. Over long holding periods, even a difference of a few basis points compounds into a meaningfully different final corpus, which is why expense ratio is one of the few fund attributes an investor can compare with total certainty before investing, unlike future returns.
How does UTI Retirement Fund-'s expense ratio compare to its category?
UTI Retirement Fund-'s expense ratio of 1.16% ranks #13 of 29 funds in the Retirement Fund category (lower is better) - the category median is 1.15%. Expense ratio is deducted from the fund's assets every year regardless of performance, so a lower ratio is a real, certain cost advantage rather than a projection, unlike future returns.
How big is UTI Retirement Fund-, and how does that compare to its category?
UTI Retirement Fund- manages ₹4,540 Cr in assets, ranking #2 of 29 funds by size in the Retirement Fund category - the category median is ₹265 Cr. A larger fund generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but in categories with a smaller investable universe (like small or mid cap), a very large fund can also face more difficulty entering and exiting positions without moving the price.
What's the worst drawdown UTI Retirement Fund- has experienced, and how does that compare to its category?
UTI Retirement Fund-'s worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 3 years was 6.27%, ranking #10 of 27 funds in the Retirement Fund category (lower is better) - the category median is 11.10%. Max drawdown measures the deepest loss an investor holding through the worst stretch would have seen, before any recovery - a smaller number means a gentler ride, though it says nothing about how long the fund took to recover.
How has UTI Retirement Fund- performed against its benchmark, CRISIL Short Term Debt Hybrid 60+40 Index?
Over a 3-year window, UTI Retirement Fund- has outperformed its benchmark, CRISIL Short Term Debt Hybrid 60+40 Index, by 0.8% (alpha). Alpha measures the fund's return in excess of what its benchmark alone would have delivered, after adjusting for the risk taken (beta of 0.83 here) - a positive alpha means the fund manager's stock selection and allocation calls added real value beyond simply tracking the market, while a negative alpha means the fund would have been better replicated by a low-cost index fund tracking the same benchmark. This is a trailing, historical figure and isn't a guarantee of future outperformance.
What's the best and worst 3-year holding period for UTI Retirement Fund- historically?
Looking at every overlapping 3-year window in UTI Retirement Fund-'s history, the best-performing window ran from 2023-08-16 to 2026-08-15, delivering a 10.0% CAGR. The worst-performing window ran from 2023-10-13 to 2026-10-12, delivering a 7.9% CAGR. This is a historical record of actual past outcomes, not a prediction - it shows the real range of results an investor holding for exactly 3 years could have seen depending on entry timing, which is why rolling returns (median across all windows, shown above) are a more representative single number than either extreme.
How concentrated are UTI Retirement Fund-'s top holdings?
UTI Retirement Fund-'s single largest disclosed holding, NET CURRENT ASSETS, accounts for 14.28% of NAV. Its top 5 holdings together make up 29.9% of the portfolio, and its top 10 disclosed holdings make up 40.8% - as of 2026-09-30. A higher concentration in the top few names means the fund's returns lean more heavily on those specific bets paying off, while a flatter spread means no single holding drives outcomes as much either way.
Who manages UTI Retirement Fund-, and what category does it belong to?
UTI Retirement Fund- is managed by UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. and is classified under the Retirement Fund category, the SEBI-defined scheme categorization that groups funds by their investment mandate (market-cap focus, sector, or asset mix) so investors can compare like-for-like funds rather than across unrelated strategies. The AMC (asset management company) is the regulated entity legally responsible for the fund's operations, portfolio decisions, and disclosures, though day-to-day investment calls are made by a designated fund manager within the mandate set by the scheme's category and stated objective.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.